[r-t] Doubles Principles

[edward martin]

On 16 February 2011 09:21, H C Pumphrey <H.C.Pumphrey at ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> H C Pumphrey wrote:
>
> OK, so I just tried 10 changes. Lots of possibilities emerge of which
> 3-1-5-1-3-1-5-1-3-1- is just one. And as it is pure doubles you can
> immediately obtain a 100 with two singles. But I suspect that the remaining
> 20 changes are a bit inaccessible.
>
> You could splice it with original
ie ring PN 3 1 5 1 3 1 for 42351
then 3rds to give 24315
Now plain hunt 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 for 42135
Places in 345 gives 24135
Now PN 1 3 1 gives part end 14253
Ring 3 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 3 1 four times for 52341
Repeat

Eddie Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20110216/cd2e546b/attachment-0004.html>