[r-t] minor with no adjacent places

Alexander Holroyd holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Tue Jan 11 01:12:41 UTC 2011

As some will have noticed, now something else has:


On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Philip Saddleton wrote:

> To answer the original question, I doubt that anything other than Original 
> has been rung.
> edward martin said  on 18/12/2010 08:19:
>> On 17 December 2010 21:30, Alexander Holroyd<holroyd at math.ubc.ca>  wrote:
>>> What extents of minor with no adjacent places have been rung?
>>> By adjacent places, I mean place notations 12,34,56,1236, etc.
>>> It is easily possible to construct such an extent.  E.g. there are 
>>> bobs-only
>>> extents of original.  But I can't think of anything commonly rung that is
>>> like this.
>> I.m only halfway through the first cup of coffee and am not really
>> awake, but at first thought I'd say that you can't get an extent of
>> plain minor because it would need two singles, and you can't get an
>> extent of T.B. mnor because it needs places when treble is in 3-4
>> therefore only Minor principals offer the possibility...but looking at
>> who asked the question, I know you already know that!!
>> Eddie Martin
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list