[r-t] (no subject)

[Robert Lee]

On Mon Jul 4 04:26:45, Don Morrison wrote:

>This does raise a question, though: is it possible to have a method >with no 
>hunt bell(s) where all the bells do the same work, but there >are not the same 
>number of leads as bells? The Council's definitions >appear to be carefully 
>addressing such a case, but it's not clear to >me that it can arise in practice. 
>Can someone provide an example of >such a method?

I think this is a mathematical impossibility, but I have no idea 
how to prove it.

Rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20110704/3e0f44ae/attachment-0003.html>