[r-t] Unprinciple extent!
holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Fri Jul 15 23:44:49 UTC 2011
To some extent I agree about the particular method. But you also said:
"For example, a method should really be defined as the shortest/simplest
place notation that helps ringers learn what is required."
and it's this that I was taking issue with. "Should" sounds like trying
to legislate (or at least advocate), and on this topic it seems hopeless
and undesirable to do so...
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011, Graham John wrote:
> Ander wrote:
>> But simplicity is a matter of opinion. I don't
>> think one should try to legislate based on it.
> I am in total agreement Ander - I wasn't trying to legislate. I was just
> expressing an opinion that this particular method could be expressed in a
> simpler form if one actually intended to ring it. It was still an elegant
> solution to the problem posed!
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
More information about the ringing-theory