[r-t] Unprinciple extent!
matt.dawson at cantab.net
Tue Jul 19 11:29:11 UTC 2011
On 16 July 2011 00:39, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote:
> It would be a lot simpler to
> think of it as the following much shorter and far less samey twin-hunt
> &-4-22.214.171.124-4-, 23
> With a 234 bob
This is certainly how I'd learn it if I were to organise an attempt
I find it interesting, though, that each bob (on this plan) affects
either the front three or the back three.
So, is this technically a twin-hunter or a differential? And,
presumably, if I called it in this manner, I wouldn't be allowed to
name the original unprinciple - or is this a grey area in the
More information about the ringing-theory