[r-t] Unprinciple extent!

Matt Dawson matt.dawson at cantab.net
Tue Jul 19 11:29:11 UTC 2011

On 16 July 2011 00:39, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote:
> It would be a lot simpler to
> think of it as the following much shorter and far less samey twin-hunt
> method:
>        &-4-, 23
> With a 234 bob

This is certainly how I'd learn it if I were to organise an attempt
(see <http://ringing.org/main/pages/method?notation=-4->).
I find it interesting, though, that each bob (on this plan) affects
either the front three or the back three.

So, is this technically a twin-hunter or a differential? And,
presumably, if I called it in this manner, I wouldn't be allowed to
name the original unprinciple - or is this a grey area in the


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list