[r-t] 4-bell runs

[Alan Reading]

On 15 February 2012 12:24, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Alan Reading
> <alan.reading at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I presume this figure is arrived at by counting the number of 4-bell runs
> > of a given type (eg (90ET) anywhere within the change,
>
> In this measure does a 567890ET count as one run? Two runs? Five runs?
>

5 runs.
I think it's right the weight a long run more highly but perhaps this is
where the measure falls down.
Is an 8-bell run really worth 5 times a 4-bell run?

Cheers,
Alan





> Or something else?
>
>
> --
> Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> "Geography is only physics slowed down, with a few
> trees stuck on it."                -- Terry Pratchett, _Jingo_
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>