[r-t] Bobs only peal of Plain Bob Triples

[Richard Allton]

Philip

Here's one 

5040 Plain Bob Triples
by Henry Hubbard

23456  W  F  O  I  M  H
-----------------------
25643           1  -  3
65342              -  3
62453  -     1        3
34562     -           3
-----------------------
5 part.

The same plan can be used for an extent of original minor - as I found out
by writing a letter to the RW in 1992.

Cheers
Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Philip Earis
Sent: 13 June 2012 9:23 PM
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: [r-t] Bobs only peal of Plain Bob Triples

A frequent misconception in ringing theory is that you need singles to ring
a peal of plain bob triples.

Clearly this is not the case - see eg this 9 part by Prof Holroyd:

===
5040 Plain Bob Triples
Alexander E. Holroyd

W B I M  23456
--------------
- - -    63254
  - -    45362
  - - -  56342
  - -    24653
- -(-)   34256
--------------
9 part.  Omit (-) in parts 3,6 and 9 (3rd part end 234756) ===

My question though is: has a bobs-only extent of PB7 ever been rung?  I'm
probably unaware of multiple peals of something obvious, but even after a
quick search I'm not aware of any examples.




_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net