[r-t] 8 spliced atw 7com

[Alan Reading]

But isn't that a bit of a failure of the restrictive nature of a
"conventional composition of spliced" if compositions finishing at the snap
cannot be considered round blocks?

On 29 March 2012 11:59, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote:

> Alan asks,
>
>
> How do you deal with the case when a composition finishes at the snap?
>> (a) When the method in the last 2 changes if the same as the one at the
>> start.
>> (b) When it is different.
>> Clearly when viewed as a circle what one is effectively doing is
>> redefining
>> a snap as a lead end but what status does this have as com?
>>
>
> Very easy! A composition finishing at the snap is not a round block (when
> considered using the units which make up a conventional composition of
> spliced, that is, entire leads). Hence, there is no "change of method"
> possible between start and finish, since they do not join up.
>
>
> MBD
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/**mailman/listinfo/ringing-**theory_bellringers.net<http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net>
>