[r-t] 8 spliced atw 7com

[Roddy Horton]

8 bells.




On Thu 29/03/12 13:40 , Simon Gay <Simon.Gay at glasgow.ac.uk> wrote:

> I don't think Roddy said how many bells he is interested in. I expect a
> composition of the desired form is more likely to exist for Maximus than
> for Major, especially if you use non-standard bobs so that you can just
> have a bob at the end of each course.
> 
> Simon
> 
> On 29/03/2012 13:32, Robert Lee wrote:
> > 2p worth: I do follow MBD's argument and have no strong preference
> either way how
> > people choose to define com. But there is a time and a place for the
> 'conductor's logic' -
> > take Roddys one part peal of BLFG. I've seen it sent up as 113 or 112
> com and
> > this gives a handy indication of who's chickened out and called the
> split tenors
> > section at the start rather than the end.
> >
> > In response to Roddy's original point, I'd be surprised if a peal with
> 7(/8)
> > com was possible (for example, IIRC every in course tenors together
> course of London is
> > false against the plain course of Superlative). And even if some
> bizarre selection of tenors
> > parted courses did fit the bill, it'd likely be complete gash.
> > Rob
> > _______________________________________________
> > ringing-theory mailing list
> > ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> > http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
> [1]
> 
> The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
> [2]
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> http://webmail.karoo.co.uk/parse.php?redirect=http://bellringers.net/mailma
> n/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net[2]
> http://webmail.karoo.co.uk/parse.php?redirect=http://bellringers.net/mailma
> n/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>