[r-t] Pipe's Particles

Simon Gay Simon.Gay at glasgow.ac.uk
Fri Nov 23 11:10:04 UTC 2012

Looks great. Congratulations to all.

On the subject of CC classification, which of course you are not very 
interested in (and that's fine), according to Don Morrison's method 
description web site, the methods are classified as follows:

Top Little Hybrid Maximus

Up Differential Little Hybrid Maximus

Strange Differential Maximus

Down Differential Little Hybrid Maximus

Charm Differential Little Hybrid Maximus

Bottom Differential Maximus

Lepton Little Bob Maximus

Gluon Little Alliance Maximus

Quark Maximus

"Little" because there are hunt bells that don't ring in every position; 
"Hybrid" because there are hunt bells with asymmetrical paths.


On 23/11/2012 05:21, Philip Earis wrote:
> Last night we rang the first peal of a wonderful new David Pipe maximus composition, which I feel represents a new paradigm in spliced:
> <http://bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=192236>
> The peal is essentially a cyclic 12 part, but that description doesn't convey the novelty. The new composition is very much "architectured", using an optimal and very clever "top-down" framework from the outset, which is built up with custom components (methods) to best achieve the design.
> (By contrast nearly all peals rung to date have been "constructed", with the composer starting with a selected method or group of methods, and then attempting to arrange these into as satisfying assembly as possible. I tried to set out in more depth the difference between a "constructed" and "architectured" approach in a March 2011 message to this list:
> http://www.bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/2011-March/003770.html)
> So what's the design principle behind the new composition? Well, fundamentally it is that the best way to exploit the music in a cyclic 12-part is too use short structure-dominated blocks to give a glorious, fluid, elegant and truly balanced diversity of run music, rather than employ conventional treble-dominated methods which intrinsically are not best-suited to a 12 part composition.
> The new composition is divided into two halves. The first half contains a palindromic block of 6 methods, each of which is itself a highly-structured palindrome with a 'x' change at the leadend. The methods varyingly rotate or reverse groups of 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10 bells, to continually generate varied runs (both forward and back), on different groups of bells, at both strokes, in all 12 parts. The result is mesmeric, full-on, ultra-high-definition,"total ringing":
> 1234567890ET Top
> ------------
> 2134567890ET Up
> 1234TE098765 Strange
> 567890ET4321 Down
> TE0987654312 Charm
> 7890ET654321 Bottom
> 5634128709TE Charm
> 2143658709ET Down
> 7856341209TE Strange
> ET9021436587 Up
> TE9078563412 Top
> (ET9078563412)
> (No doubt the CC method fascists will arbitrarily try to redefine Top as an mx method rung with an implied 'x' bob or somesuch, but this arguably doesn't reflect the true nature of it)
> The first half of the composition ends with reverse rounds at the handstroke row, and then a 10ths place bob to bring up T0E896745312. There then follows a sequence of calls to get to the mega-tittums course, exploit tittums and run music, shunt to a different cyclic part with the mirror-symmetric 'right-place-rung-wrong' principle Quark, and then reverse the palindrome to get to the partend:
> T0E896745312 Lepton (8ths)
> T0E896751423 Plain Bob (6ths)
> T0E897162534 Gluon (4ths)
> T0E918273645 Gluon (2nds)
> TE1029384756 Quark (2nds)
> 67859403E2T1 Gluon (4ths)
> 678905E4T312 Gluon (6ths)
> 67890ET51423 Plain Bob (8ths)
> 67890ET12534 Lepton (10ths)
> 67890ET12345
> ------------
> 12 Part
> This second half of the composition is very similar to the second half used in the "Jupiter" cyclic 12 part, first rung in 2007 and which I described here:
> http://www.bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/2007-November/001840.html
> In the new composition, Gluon takes the role of (and is similar to) Amalthea, generating spectacular and varied runs out of the ether in the near-tittums courses.
> Looking at the methods as a whole, the 6 building blocks used in the first half (named after the 6 flavours of the sub-atomic particles called quarks) are short, structured and attractive. All have palindromic symmetry, Bottom further has mirror symmetry, and 'Up' and 'Down' are reversals of each other:
> --
> Top Differential: &5.4x5x2x45x4.5.4,x 2134567890ET
> Up Differential: &3.2x1x4.5x5.34,x 2134TE098765
> Strange Differential: &58x58x58x67x1x1x,x TE0987654321
> Down Differential: &0.Ex1x9.8x8.90,x 8765432190TE
> Charm Differential: &7x7x67x678,x 6543217890TE
> Bottom Differential: &58x58x3670x30.49x,x 8709TE214365
> Lepton Little Bob: a &,2
> Gluon Little Alliance: a &,2
> Quark: &3x50x78x1x1x3x9,x T0E896745231
> --
> In terms of ringability, the high structure of the methods and composition make them really fairly straightforward to ring if approached with a structure-based mindset. If you come in with a raw 'blue line only' toolkit you may need to adapt, or find yourself outside your comfort zone.
> The musical result really is dynamic, wonderful, and to my mind represents a new paradigm in higher-numbers composition. Find a band and ring it, people. It's mind-expanding stuff.
> So what's next? Well, the first half of the composition is essentially a blank canvas. There are limitless possibilities into the choice and style of building blocks that can be used in this framework. It's analogous to the conceptual introduction of something like 7-part 23-spliced major frameworks, where the methods can be selected to suit.
> Regarding evolution to the second half of the composition, I'd personally like to see one of the Plain Bob or Lepton to be replaced by Cat o' Nine Tails or an analogue (eg a &, to give a lovely music-box juxtaposition between staticity and dynamism. But this is all a question of taste.
> In any case, the current composition is a magnificent achievement that doesn't need refinement. That I'm tapping out an excitable stream-of-thought on my Blackberry at silly o'clock shows how buzzing I am about this.
> Near the end of the film Pulp Fiction, the character Jimmie says, "I don't need you to tell me how good my coffee is, okay? I'm the one who buys it, I know how good it is". I can't help but think that Mr Pipe has every right to be saying something similar regarding the composition.
> Welcome to the future, people.
> Sent from my BlackBerry
> This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening. The Royal Society of Chemistry is a charity, registered in England and Wales, number 207890 - Registered office: Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list