[r-t] Method help

[Alan Reading]

I would advise you to look at is the parity of the various courses you
ring.
There is no reason why a composition with that sort of music couldn't be
true to a method with just c falseness but the problem is the parity of the
split tenors sections. For example the in-course 7856 courses are false
with the 7586 courses by c. But out of course 7856 courses (or in course
8765 courses) would be fine. You can easily achieve this by changing the
VMMMF section to sVMMMsF. Unfortunately there is still another problem.
The 7568 courses are false with the 7658 courses by c. You need to alter
the parity (or the stroke) of one of these but not both. Obviously that
means that a 2-part with 65 part end isn't going to be successful here. You
might be able to re-arrange the composition into a 1-part or 3-part so
something like this happens though.


On 11 April 2013 18:42, Alistair Cherry <alistaircherry at googlemail.com>wrote:

> Thanks for your replies. Replacing the blocks of three with 2 singles help
> a lot (it's true to Yorkshire) but obviously you lose a third of the music,
> and most of the other runs which appeared by accident.
>
> Alistair
>
>
> On 11 April 2013 18:23, Alan Reading <alan.reading at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's certainly not true to methods with any of BDE a or c falseness. That
> > knocks out pretty much all the conventional place notional starts (3x,
> x3,
> > 36x, x36, 34x, x34, x56, 56x, 5x, x5) as all of them give one of these.
> > It's just possible there is some method with a very bizzare start and
> > an unusual combination of FCH's for which it is true but I suspect even
> > that is unlikely.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> >
> > On 11 April 2013 18:04, Alistair Cherry <alistaircherry at googlemail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I have produced the following peal composition for group B treble
> dodging
> > > major which ought to produce oodles of music in all of the back bell
> > > combinations:
> > >
> > > 5376 Group B Treble Dodging Major (AJC No.70)
> > >
> > > V  B  M  W  F  I  H 23456
> > >    -                35264
> > > -     3     -       42635
> > >          3     -  3 234756
> > > -        -        3 324657
> > >
> > > 2 part.
> > >
> > > It's true to double bob so there's nothing intrinsically wrong with the
> > > composition, but it's false to every rung group B treble dodging major
> > > method I've tried. Can anyone point me in the direction of a method
> that
> > > works, or it there some reason that this isn't possible for a treble
> > > dodging method?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Alistair
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <
> > >
> >
> http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20130411/c2668ad3/attachment.html
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ringing-theory mailing list
> > > ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> > > http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
> > >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> >
> http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20130411/2f81e014/attachment.html
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ringing-theory mailing list
> > ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> > http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20130411/8738629b/attachment.html
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory_bellringers.net/attachments/20130411/cdc81aaf/attachment.html>