[r-t] method help

[edward martin]

Memory aint what it was but I thought that  Cyril Wratten had done
this first, prior to his publishing his collection of Surprise Major
comps
also re- robin's e-mail surely the analysis is only true for symmetric methods?
EWM


On 12 April 2013 12:21, Glenn Taylor <gaataylor at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Robin wrote:
> ---
> As you all know (!!), John Leary, at RW80/259, analysed all the possible
> first two changes of a TD major method for the falseness they produce.
> etc.
> ---
>
> I have a recollection of a later analysis by Marcus Sherwood (or Giles
> Thompson?) in the RW in the early 1980s. The article was called something
> like "Deriving the FCH from the place notation" and I think it analysed the
> treble's 1/2 and 3/4 sections completely.
>
> Glenn
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net