[r-t] Falseness (was Re: The null change

[Mark Davies]

Don writes,

> Sadly I think there is less participation by some folks
> who had interesting things to say before; I suspect they largely
> remain exhausted and uninterested in repeating what they've said
> before since it essentially led nowhere.

and,

> On the other hand, this time around we do seem to be being at
 > least a little more focused (hard to believe, I know) and
 > converging to some interesting near-consensus views.

Yes, and this is why I am being such a miserable bloody git! For which I 
apologise; but I do think that to make something happen, we have to keep 
a precise focus on the subset of bellringing which matters to most 
people - β-methods.

MBD