[r-t] Cinques focus

[Alan Reading]

It is palindromic, just not about the section end. The method was defined
as 9.E.9.E.9.3.1.3.1.3 in order to have the same rows at the section ends
as Erin does (plain bob lead heads in affect) but if you simply start in a
different place the (eg E.9.3.1.3.1.3.9.E.9 which is the same as
9&E.9.3.1.3) then you can see from the place notation that it is
conventionally palindromic.


On 3 February 2014 16:27, Ted Steele <teds.bells at tesco.net> wrote:

> On 03/02/2014 14:57, Matthew Frye wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3 Feb 2014, at 14:48, Philip Earis <Earisp at rsc.org> wrote:
>>
>>  The method has glide symmetry, well employed here,
>>>
>>
>>  I'm a bit puzzled about the choice of name, though.  "Nirerin" as a word
>>> seems to be a palindromic play on "Erin", but palindromic symmetry is
>>> something that the method NIrerin lacks?
>>>
>>
>> I fear a search for a glide-symmetric name could be a largely frustrating
>> one...
>>
>
>
>
> What am I missing? It looks pretty well palindromic to me.
>
> Ted
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>