[r-t] Cinques focus

[Alan Reading]

I think the problem you will have in getting a worthwhile peal of just
Nirerin is the calls.
You can't have Erin type calls because the section starts with 9.
In the spliced we rang 149 and 12349 calls in place of the 3rd 9 of the
section. These work really well for rotating a block of 4 bells whilst
keeping 7 others fixed and up to 8 courses can be joined this way. But I
suspect they are a bit clunky for getting useful turning courses. The Erin
was spliced in to speed things up and to allow normal calls in Erin for
moving things around.

Cheers,
Alan


On 3 February 2014 19:36, Paul Flavell <flavells at f2s.com> wrote:

> Nirerin looks like a nice method in its own right.  Is it possible to get a
> peal composition out of it, what calls would you use, or is it only
> feasible
> spliced with Erin?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On
> Behalf Of Philip Earis
> Sent: 03 February 2014 14:49
> To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> Subject: [r-t] Cinques focus
>
> Sorry, just catching up on what's been happening. I am rather thrilled to
> see some new Cinques being rung -Alan Reading has put together a cyclic
> composition of spliced "Nirerin" and Erin Cinques -
> http://www.bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=320841. it's pleasing to see
> some 11-bell innovation rather than falling back on the tired old diet of
> Stedman.
>
> Nirerin Cinques is a rather nice principle with 10-change sections:
> 9.E.9.E.9.3.1.3.1.3 = 241638507E9, leading to double-dodging in 3-4, 4-5,
> 5-6 and so on.  The method has glide symmetry, well employed here, and it
> looks like the composition suitably and simply exploits the regular
> coursing
> musical properties.
>
> I'm a bit puzzled about the choice of name, though.  "Nirerin" as a word
> seems to be a palindromic play on "Erin", but palindromic symmetry is
> something that the method NIrerin lacks?
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of
> the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright
> material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person
> without
> the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us
> immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but
> is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be
> held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC
> owes
> no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss.
> The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for
> personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC
> does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely
> on your own screening. The Royal Society of Chemistry is a charity,
> registered in England and Wales, number 207890 - Registered office: Thomas
> Graham House, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WF
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>