[r-t] Minor Blocks: Poll results
iain at 13to8.co.uk
Mon Jul 21 19:43:21 UTC 2014
> Is Plain Hunt a method?
> Yes. It has a 2-change lead.
> I'd clarify that the name given to the method with this 2-change lead in
> the CC Method Collections is Original. There isn't a method in the
> Collections with the name Plain Hunt.
This is something that I have always found absurd. The most commonly
rung method on a practice night, the method that all ringers are taught,
isn't recognised by the current decisions. How does one explain to a
grass-roots ringer that Plain Hunt isn't a method, and expect to be
Surely something has got to give in any future decisions. Either:
A) Plain Hunt is still not recognised as a method.
B) It is a method with a 2-change(/row) lead.
B.1) We allow methods to have multiple names, e.g., Plain Hunt and
B.2) We don't allow multiple names. Original is deleted from the
C) It is a 12-change(/row) lead, which isn't the minimum non-divisible
I would be interested to hear from anyone who a) doesn't want multiple
names for the same method, and b) wants a lead to be the minimum
non-divisible block, why it is that they don't want Plain Hunt to be
recognised as a method or why they want to delete Original?
More information about the ringing-theory