ajgraham42 at yahoo.com
Sun Jul 27 17:49:06 UTC 2014
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Robin Woolley robin at robinw.org.uk
>This is nonsense. I would suggest 99% is a more realistic figure here.
>We must remember that the Particles peal, which started this, has been
>rung by less that 0.1% of ringers. b.t.w, it seems that these methods
>remain unnamed officially, as the peals predate the Decision change.
I'm a little confused as to what recording all 3 names St Helens/Cloister/Bastow Little Bob Doubles in a method collection has to do with the Pipe Quark methods. Robin seems dangerously obsessed with this peal which has the sum total of sod all to do with the poll that Tim is currently organising.
More information about the ringing-theory