[r-t] One Spliced Surprise Major

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Fri Jun 6 09:36:32 UTC 2014

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:52 AM, John Fisher <ghoti at mad.scientist.com> wrote:
> DFM:
> > The normal lead of Cambridge is the normal lead of Cambridge.
> > The snap lead you think of as *two* leads of Cambridge
> No, the snap start is also Cambridge, since "Starting the plain course from
> a different change does not give a different method." ((E)A2)  Your calls
> are the omission of 30 changes when you change from X to C, and two changes
> going from C to X.

I'm sorry, I'm still not following. How many leads, whole or
fractional, does it contain? If you only delete rows from leads and
never add them, to get to the length you need more total leads than
there are Cs and Xs in the current composition description, right?

Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"We are all of us obliged, if we are to make reality endurable,
to nurse a few little follies in ourselves."
           -- Marcel Proust, _À la recherche du temps perdu_,
              tr. C. K. Scott Moncrieff

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list