[r-t] History
John Camp
camp at bellringers.org
Sat Jun 7 07:43:51 UTC 2014
At 21:18 on 06 June 2014, Mark Davies wrote:
> JEC writes,
>> In what sense is "5040 changes" purer than "5000 changes"?
> It is a mathematical purity, because 5040 = the factorial of the number
> of bells. To ring 5040 changes you must ring every combination of seven
> bells, not every combination minus an arbitrary handful.
Yes - I imagine that there is no-one on this list who isn't aware of
that. Bur it isn't an argument; it's a prejudice.
Think of all those people defiling themselves by ringing impure peals
on 8 or more. Disgusting, I call it.
JEC
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list