[r-t] Peals in methods

John Fisher ghoti at mad.scientist.com
Tue Jun 10 09:40:37 UTC 2014

> I can see what you mean about it not being clear that a peal 
> must be composed entirely of methods or non-method blocks, 
> but I am certain that it is the intent.

I'm sure that is the intent, but I don't think it's what the decisions say.
Reading (D)A.11 and (D)A.13 together, either peals must include both or
don't have to contain either.  Your composition in neither would have to be
constructed without calls, though.  Don, over to you...


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list