[r-t] Gangnam (or whatever) etc.

Robin Woolley robin at robinw.org.uk
Wed May 14 06:04:30 UTC 2014

Hi All

The 1440 printed at p109 of the Diary gives a true 2880 to Gangnam as 
might be expected intuitively - so the footnote to the comp. is (not 
yet) false. As Graham John seems to be saying, one needs an even number 
of extents 'packaged' to obtain a true comp. - an odd number won't do.

Best wishes

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list