[r-t] proving a touch
King, Peter R
peter.king at imperial.ac.uk
Wed May 21 07:59:06 UTC 2014
I guess it depends on what you mean by True. I think John Warboys has basically answered the question. If the only criterion is that no change appears more than twice then yes it is true to Cambridge. I sort of feel that I would expect a quarter composition to have all 720 changes plus 552 (or whatever number) changes repeated once only. That's a stricter criterion than applied here. On the other hand for quarters I probably wouldn't be so picky as for peals.
From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Ian McCulloch
Sent: 21 May 2014 08:50
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] proving a touch
On Wed, 21 May 2014, King, Peter R wrote:
> I have just put it through both Excalibur and Ringing Master and they say that this change doesn't appear. So probably you are right it isn't there.
Interesting. But I think it IS true to Cambridge, despite the footnote!
Do you agree?
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
More information about the ringing-theory