[r-t] proving a touch

[King, Peter R]

I guess it depends on what you mean by True.  I think John Warboys has basically answered the question. If the only criterion is that no change appears more than twice then yes it is true to Cambridge. I sort of feel that I would expect a quarter composition to have all 720 changes plus 552 (or whatever number) changes repeated once only. That's a stricter criterion than applied here. On the other hand for quarters I probably wouldn't be so picky as for peals.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Ian McCulloch
Sent: 21 May 2014 08:50
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] proving a touch


On Wed, 21 May 2014, King, Peter R wrote:

> I have just put it through both Excalibur and Ringing Master and they say that this change doesn't appear. So probably you are right it isn't there.

Interesting.  But I think it IS true to Cambridge, despite the footnote! 
Do you agree?

Cheers,
Ian

_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net