[r-t] proving a touch
King, Peter R
peter.king at imperial.ac.uk
Wed May 21 08:13:55 UTC 2014
Yes I think it does contain all the rows. Perhaps the footnote is wrong. It satisfies the criteria as far as I can see.
From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Ian McCulloch
Sent: 21 May 2014 09:03
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] proving a touch
On Wed, 21 May 2014, King, Peter R wrote:
> I guess it depends on what you mean by True. I think John Warboys has
> basically answered the question. If the only criterion is that no
> change appears more than twice then yes it is true to Cambridge. I
> sort of feel that I would expect a quarter composition to have all 720
> changes plus
> 552 (or whatever number) changes repeated once only. That's a stricter
> criterion than applied here. On the other hand for quarters I probably
> wouldn't be so picky as for peals.
I think, for cambridge though, that it does contain all 720 rows, as well as no rows appearing more than twice. So I don't know what the footnote is supposed to mean. What other criteria could there be that it fails for Cambridge?
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
More information about the ringing-theory