[r-t] A Ringing Puzzle
rbennett at woosh.co.nz
Sat May 24 12:54:25 UTC 2014
There was once a CC resolution in the old days when it was more
keen on preventing things: "that the publication of palpably false
compositions and worthless methods reflects discredit on their
composers" (or words to that effect).
With that in mind here goes:
----- Original Message -----
From:ringing-theory at bellringersnet
Sent:Sat, 24 May 2014 10:58:44 +0100
Subject:Re: [r-t] A Ringing Puzzle
The fuss is all man, or should I say, committee made.
I don't understand why we don't simply call a series of changes which,
when repeated an undefined number of times, comes back into rounds as
If a method is false in its plain course so what? Who cares? 99.99% of
those listening won't know.
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
More information about the ringing-theory