[r-t] A Ringing Puzzle

Robert Bennett rbennett at woosh.co.nz
Sat May 24 12:54:25 UTC 2014



	There was once a CC resolution in the old days when it was more
keen on preventing things: "that the publication of palpably false
compositions and worthless methods reflects discredit on their
composers"  (or words to that effect). 

	With that in mind here goes: 

	Grandsire Triples 

	  234567 

	  253746 

	s762453 

	-347562 

	-253647 

	-762453 

	 746325 

	s357246 

	repeat twice.

----- Original Message -----
 From:ringing-theory at bellringersnet
To:
Cc:
Sent:Sat, 24 May 2014 10:58:44 +0100
Subject:Re: [r-t] A Ringing Puzzle

The fuss is all man, or should I say, committee made.

I don't understand why we don't simply call a series of changes which,
when repeated an undefined number of times, comes back into rounds as
a 
'method'.

If a method is false in its plain course so what? Who cares? 99.99% of
those listening won't know.

Roddy

_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net




More information about the ringing-theory mailing list