[r-t] Monster extent of triples

[Mark Davies]

Robert Bennett writes,

> It may be that there are only a relatively small number of these
> monster peals. In that case they will have more of their own
> character, and less of where they were derived from, but they should
> still show some.

Really? I would have thought that 99.99999% of all possible 
triple-change peals of Triples are of this random "Monster peal" nature.

MBD