[r-t] What people think they have rung

Matthew Frye matthew at frye.org.uk
Wed Oct 22 12:27:46 UTC 2014

On 21 Oct 2014, at 17:16, Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk> wrote:

> Matthew wrote:
>> that two methods that could not be
>> distinguished by the rows in any of
>> their plain courses should be linked
>> as being somehow the same in our
>> decisions and records. 
> But methods are not defined by their rows, but by a sequence of changes.
> Beverley and Surfleet S Minor cannot be distinguished by their rows.

I was assuming rows to be an ordered list.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list