[r-t] Survey #4: Naming of rotations. Results.

John Camp camp at bellringers.org
Sun Oct 26 14:06:53 UTC 2014

At 00:11 on 26 October 2014, Matthew Frye wrote:

> So. Pretty much as inconclusive as it's possible to be, the slight
> edge to option 1 is too small to be considered a "result".

How statistically significant is a poll of potentially over 200
people with 33 respondents, self-selected and with a particular
interest in (and firm views on) the topic?  The list itself is
self-selecting to start with.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list