[r-t] A simpler approach?

Mark Davies mark at snowtiger.net
Tue Oct 28 20:58:40 UTC 2014

John Harrison writes,

> I asked Peter whether they had considered the fundamental problem that to
> define a method you had to ring it in a peal but that peals had to be in
> methods of a type already defined.  Tony Smith replied, saying that they
> had solved that problem by allowing blocks, so anybody could ring anything
> in a peal.

Oh my goodness.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list