[r-t] Results of Poll on the Null Change

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Thu Jan 8 02:40:03 UTC 2015

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Matthew Frye <matthew at frye.org.uk> wrote:
> More seriously, I wonder if we're better going back to basics,
>rather than pushing forward to more complex things. We don't even
>have agreed definitions on such fundamentals as a "change", or a
>"method". Let alone "peal", "truth", or "change-ringing"...

Why do we need a definition of "change-ringing"? Is not defining its
constituent parts sufficient?

Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"Unsheathe your dagger definitions."  -- James Joyce, _Ulysses_

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list