[r-t] Definitions so far

John Harrison john at jaharrison.me.uk
Fri Jan 16 11:23:49 UTC 2015

> the name "simple change" would need to change, since a null change
> is simpler than a simple chanage!

Surely you wouldn't rule out a sequence:  'none, few, many' on the grounds
that none is fewer than few?

John Harrison
Website http://jaharrison.me.uk

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list