[r-t] Definitions so far

Graham John graham at changeringing.co.uk
Sat Jan 17 13:56:44 UTC 2015

RAS wrote:

> A literal interpretation of these definitions
> suggest it is both a jump change and an
> ordinary change...
> I rather suspect this isn't what you intended.

Good point. It demonstrates the difficulty of coming up with a definition
that is short, simple, yet precise and unambiguous. Do you have a suggestion
of how it could be worded better?

>> Row: A sequence of bells at a given Stage in which each bell rings 
>> once and only once.

> This excludes a cylindrical row.

I thought there was no appetite for catering for cylindrical at the moment.
It would require a whole new set of thinking, particularly in terms of truth
and even what an extent is.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list