[r-t] Method ringing vs. change ringing

[Alexander Holroyd]

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Don Morrison wrote:

> This seems a sensible idea, and well in keeping with the Council's
> charge to have a fundamental rethink. As you allude to, I think that,
> at least for peals, the only devil-detail is truth. And while thorny,
> it is probably not insurmountable; at the very least, an if/then/else
> sort of structure should at least be able to result in something that
> accounts for everything allowed today.

Right, and moreover I was making the point that it is only variable stage 
and possibly variable cover that are thorny.

>> This section could include a disclaimer along the lines of:
>> "The requirements of this section relate solely to the changes rung,
>> regardless of the manner in which they are descibed".
>
> Is this really "rows rung" or am I missing something?

Yes, sorry, rows.  I was being sloppy, not trying to get the exact wording 
right.