[r-t] Method ringing vs. change ringing

Alexander Holroyd holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Fri Jan 23 21:55:39 UTC 2015

There seems to be far more agreement than I dared to hope on these general 

I could not agree more about "short and sweet", "too many" and "lengthy".

My point with the disclaimers (perhaps not even the right word) was to ram 
home the clear separation of "jurisdiction" between the sections.  To me 
that concept would be the biggest and most important change from the 
status quo, so I feel it should be up-front and crystal clear.

On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Mark Davies wrote:

> Agree whole-heartedly with Ander's suggestion, with the minor exception that 
> I don't think too many lengthy disclaimers are necessary. Keep it short and 
> sweet and let people use their common sense.
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list