[r-t] Method ringing vs. change ringing
mark at snowtiger.net
Fri Jan 23 22:30:21 UTC 2015
> What I would aim for here is to preserve a few well-established naming
> conventions such as Surprise, Delight, Little, but otherwise do away with
> as much as possible.
Yes, to me this is where the effort needs to be put in, because there is
a large body of rung methods, and a larger body of potential methods,
all of which ought to be treated nicely. Also I think the worst part of
the current Decisions is the excessive categorisation, one might say
ghettoization, of methods. Categories such as "Differential",
"Non-Method Block" and "False" serve to segregate methods which look the
same, and could (without the categorisation) be extensions of each other
at different stages.
More information about the ringing-theory