[r-t] Doubles 240s
holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Thu Mar 19 13:40:20 UTC 2015
Well, that wouldn't be at least 5000 changes, therefore not a peal.
The null change certainly exists. It simply means ringing the same row
twice in succession. The only question is whether doing that should be
considered somehow illegitimate.
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, John Camp wrote:
> At 13:26 on 19 March 2015, Alexander Holroyd wrote:
>> I don't know what you consider a "null peal" to be.
> Much the same as a null change. Something which doesn't exist.
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
More information about the ringing-theory