[r-t] Doubles 240s
dfm at ringing.org
Sat Mar 21 14:59:39 UTC 2015
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:24 AM, John Camp <camp at bellringers.org> wrote:
> No doubt, but you're missing the point. Those were pre-arranged
> changes, not call changes.
No they were umbrellas.
This whole conversation started with call changes implicitly defined
not by what the (non-)conductor does, but by what the bells
do. Identity changes and all that.
If you would like to change the subject of the discussion, and assert
that it is impossible to have changes rung exclusively by having a
dedicated ringer shout what to do rung silently, then I suspect you
will find few folks disagreeing.
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"Philosophers seriously discuss the possibility that the universe is
some kind of simulation, and in one version of that scenario our
creator is a computer programmer from a very advanced...extrauniversal
civilization. (And certainly if the human predicament is the creation
of an adolescent hacker, that would explain a lot.)
-- Robert Wright, _The Evolution of God_
More information about the ringing-theory