[r-t] A practical (well, sort of) extension question

[Philip Saddleton]

On Thu, April 30, 2015 02:13, Don Morrison wrote:
> Would it be possible for someone who actually understands this
> extension stuff to tell me which, if any, of the following asymmetric,
> non-PB-leadend treble dodging major methods have extensions to a higher
> stage (not necessarily royal)? CC-algorithm or the more fecund
> PABS-algorithm, as you choose.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> A =
> 3456.3458.78.16.1278.125678.58.36.1234.1478.3478.38.34.3456.1256.1258.125
> 6.1234.34.1458.14.123478.1234.1236.125678.58.1256.1458.5678.3458x1678
>
>
> B =
> 34.58.38.1478.125678.58.12.18.1234.1278.123478.1238.16.14.1234.58.123456.
> 1236.36.18.78.34.78.16.78.56.58.1678.36.38.78.1478
>
>
> C =
> 345678.5678.34.1478.1256.5678.78.1236.1234x1478.38x1234.34.123478.56.1456
> .36.18.34.14.3478.16.1278.56.125678.1458.5678.3478.34.16
>
>
> D =
> 78.5678.58.18.56.1256x18.34.3478.78.1458.16.1456x125678.1234.34.12.123458
> .1478.14.123478.16.1278.5678.56.18.34.38.5678.145678
>
>
> E =
> 56.3478.38.1678.56.1256.5678.123678.14x1478.1258.123456.1234.14.3478.1234
> 56.1456.3456.38.78.1278.14.36x1278.125678.18x3458.3478.1456
>
>

I assume this is a comment on (G)B.6? The short answer is that none of
them is a method, so the question doesn't apply. Ignoring this, and
without looking in more detail I suspect that the answer is none under the
current Decision (a combination of B.6 and C.1(d)) and all under my
proposal.

PABS