[r-t] Method extension

[Philip Saddleton]

On Thu, April 30, 2015 23:50, Graham John wrote:
> PABS wrote:
>
>
>> That could be accommodated by allowing a line to have length zero. But
>> I
>>
> don't think it
>> is desirable - you could then add a totally unrelated piece of work,
>> e.g.
> a wrong place
>> section to a right place method.
>
> Wouldn't this only be allowing one earlier stage to a series that already
>  satisfies your criteria i.e. a contraction of places to zero where the
> higher stages successively add them?
>

Yes - I thought that is what Tony was suggesting.