[r-t] Method name
graham at changeringing.co.uk
Fri Jan 22 11:47:15 UTC 2016
It is already in the provisional library as Baldrick having been rung to a
On 22 Jan 2016 04:05, "Don Morrison" <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:
> There's a caters method that might be included in a peal we're attempting
> in about a month. It's
> I, and I suspect many other ringers, would be quite happy to call it
> "Little Bob Caters", but the Central Council clearly disagrees. Not only
> can it not be Little Bob, to pass CC muster it must have a name like
> <Something> Differential Little Bob Caters.
> However, it's not clear to me how the decision on extension applies to
> things differential-ish (leaving aside that many ringers object to viewing
> short course methods like this as "differential"--it's clear the CC does so
> view them).
> Can this caters method be named "Baldrick Differential Little Bob Caters"?
> *Must* it be named "Baldrick", or could some other name be used?
> If it needn't be named "Baldrick", could it have an empty name component
> (as Little Bob at even stages does), and thus its title would be simply
> "Differential Little Bob Caters"?
> Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
> "Although Panizzi still had a price on his head, he was now long
> removed from the early days of his exile, when the government of
> Modena would mail him advance bills for the cost of his own execution."
> -- Matthew Battles, _Library: An Unquiet History_
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ringing-theory