[r-t] Triples composition question

[Glenn Taylor]

A further (and final) contribution from me that is somewhat neater than my
previous entry:


  1  3  4  6    23456
  -------------------
  2     s  ss   62354
        s  4    64352
  -  s          42563
  - (s) ss      23645
  -------------------
  6part omitting (s) in parts 3 & 6

  -  = 125
  s  = 145


Glenn



-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On
Behalf Of Alexander Holroyd
Sent: 12 July 2016 10:55
To: 'ringing-theory at bellringers.net'
Subject: Re: [r-t] Triples composition question

This got scrambled shomehow - trying again:

123456
..-...
-.-.--
..--..
..-.2.
--...2
..3..3
5 part


On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Alexander Holroyd wrote:

> A bit of bobs-only, maybe?
>
> 123456
>  - - - --
>  --
>  - 2
> --   2
>     2
>  3  3
> 5 part
>
> Ander
>
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, King, Peter R wrote:
>
>> Needless to say the compositions are true to these as well. It 
>> doesn't surprise me at all. Ringers are amazingly conservative when 
>> it comes to new methods. Triples peals must be dominated by Stedman 
>> and Grandsire with the occasional foray into dual hunt minor methods 
>> (ie minor methods made up to triples). There are plenty of areas like 
>> this with opportunities for new methods and compositions
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] 
>> On Behalf Of Philip Earis
>> Sent: 11 July 2016 17:57
>> To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>> Subject: Re: [r-t] Triples composition question
>> 
>> Many thanks, especially to Peter and Glenn, for helping out with 
>> compositions.
>> 
>> I?ve no idea which method Jeremy is looking to ring, but to my 
>> surprise it seems there has never been a peal rung of a plain triples 
>> method with this leadhead group (especially considering it?s 1 of only 4
possible ?regular?
>> leadhead groups for plain triples).
>> 
>> I think there are 6 possible s-group plain triples methods which 
>> don?t have adjacent places made in the plain course:
>> 
>> &3.1.7.1.4.3.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> &3.1.7.3.4.1.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> &5.4.5.3.7.5.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> &7.1.5.3.7.3.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> &7.4.7.1.4.3.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> &7.4.7.3.4.1.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> 
>> 
>> Of these, two of the methods have no more than two consecutive blows 
>> made in any position:
>> 
>> &5.4.5.3.7.5.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> &7.1.5.3.7.3.4,1     Untitled Bob Triples
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ringing-theory mailing list
>> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.ne
>> t _______________________________________________
>> ringing-theory mailing list
>> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
>> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.ne
>> t
>> 
>> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>

_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20160712/4b8b8d97/attachment-0002.html>