[r-t] ?CCBR meeting - Methcom proposals

Iain Anderson iain at 13to8.co.uk
Wed Jun 1 05:37:18 UTC 2016

On 2016-05-31 20:06, Tim Barnes wrote:
> Interestingly [DJP] doesn't seem to object to short course methods 
> being Differential, ....

> I think most of us support his treatment of the Block methods.

> Under DJP's classification, ...
I think it is unwise to presume what DJP does or doesn't object to, or 
what "his" classification is, without asking him.

> there's nothing to distinguish that, for example, Charm is a hunt 
> method whereas Strange is a principle.  Doesn't this distinction help 
> in learning / ringing these methods?

Charm is a hunt method?  Really?  Why?
Strange is a principle?

Tim, I suggest that you try learning the 6 (or 7) quark methods and 
you'll see that they fit together and belong together.  Splitting them 
up into all these different classifications just doesn't make sense.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20160601/1373ffc1/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list