[r-t] ?CCBR meeting - Methcom proposals

[Mark Davies]

Don writes,

> Lumping things together that practical ringers treat as unlike one another
> seems to me to be the antithesis of simple, generic and consistent.

Except when one day it turns out that one of the Quarks is actually an 
excellent method in its own right, and people start ringing 
single-method peals of it. And then wonder why it's not in the same 
classification as other similar methods.

I am not saying this will happen with the current set of Quarks, but it 
does seem a bit foolish to judge a method solely by how it is used in a 
limited range of compositions.

MBD

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus