[r-t] ?CCBR meeting - Methcom proposals

[Don Morrison]

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk>
wrote:
> On 31 May 2016 at 11:41, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:
> >
> > Any idea why it [Bottom Block Maximus] is not in
> > http://www.methods.org.uk/method-collections/blocks/blk5.txt ?
>
> Because the peal it was rung in was the one that caused the
> decisions to be changed and stupidly the CC has never applied rule
> changes retroactively.

Would not the same argument apply to Strange, which *is* including in
blk5.txt?

And that peal has been rung again since the decisions were changed, so
should not it have been entered with a "first peal" that was not the actual
first peal, in the council's usual history rewriting way?



-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"The name that can be named is not the enduring and
unchanging name."
  -- Lau Tzu, _Tao Te Ching_, tr J Legge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20160531/39bd47ab/attachment-0002.html>