[r-t] ?CCBR meeting - Methcom proposals
dfm at ringing.org
Tue May 31 12:03:35 UTC 2016
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk>
> On 31 May 2016 at 11:41, Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org> wrote:
> > Any idea why it [Bottom Block Maximus] is not in
> > http://www.methods.org.uk/method-collections/blocks/blk5.txt ?
> Because the peal it was rung in was the one that caused the
> decisions to be changed and stupidly the CC has never applied rule
> changes retroactively.
Would not the same argument apply to Strange, which *is* including in
And that peal has been rung again since the decisions were changed, so
should not it have been entered with a "first peal" that was not the actual
first peal, in the council's usual history rewriting way?
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"The name that can be named is not the enduring and
-- Lau Tzu, _Tao Te Ching_, tr J Legge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ringing-theory