[r-t] ?CCBR meeting - Methcom proposals

John Harrison john at jaharrison.me.uk
Tue May 31 16:57:57 UTC 2016

In article
<CAHe9+Adj3-8TeqVob13gZAKK5ZMzFZodCk1vkfQGhY3xmH9h0g at mail.gmail.com>,
   Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk> wrote:

> stupidly the CC has never applied rule changes retroactively

In yesterday's meeting, after the change that legitimised peals of  5100
Doubles, I questioned the peal committee's report, which that said the peal
at Throwley (the 5100 containing the 300th first pealer last year) would be
recorded as a peal of 5040 (ie ignoring the last 60).  APS stood up and
pointed out that at the time it was rung a 5100 was not compliant so it was
correctly recorded.

John Harrison
Website http://jaharrison.me.uk

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list