[r-t] Backstroke 65s

Tue Apr 4 16:54:31 UTC 2017

Why not just start at backstroke?

Roddy

From: ringing-theory [mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of Joe Norton
Sent: 04 April 2017 17:49
To: Ringing Theory
Subject: [r-t] Backstroke 65s

In an extent of PB Minor using only standard calls, what is the maximum number of 65s at backstroke it is possible to get? Obviously 214365 has to come at hand. As does one of 124365, 132465 or 123465 before it comes round. But is it possible to get all the other 22 changes at backstroke?

Sorry if anyone is disgusted by this question :-)

Thanks,

Joe.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20170404/c1023767/attachment.html>