[r-t] Methods Committee proposed proposed changes

[Graham John]

On 21 March 2017 at 10:21, Philip Earis <pje24 at cantab.net> wrote:

> Moving on, what do you gain by changing (or even having at all) Decision
> (D) A.9?  If I'm calling a peal of maximus and I miss out a block of
> three, both the present and proposed Decision in theory compel me to
> insert a different block of three at the earliest possible opportunity,
> rather than at potentially better place. There are similar scenarios in
> calling spliced minor, or even extents of Plain Bob Doubles.

Philip makes a good point here, and the wording needs to be reviewed
for this in Tim's document too. People are generally happy to accept
peals following mis-calls, provided that amendments to the calling by
the conductor result in a true composition. This includes compositions
that are later confirmed as true when the wrong method has been called
in Spliced.

Graham