[r-t] Methods Committee proposed proposed changes

[John Harrison]

In article <7f182067-06a2-f5f1-1d48-9823322a124c at tesco.net>,
   Ted Steele <teds.bells at tesco.net> wrote:

> A rule that allows for errors in calling to be corrected after the
> event, however quickly, would therefore potentially also allow for
> falseness;

I assume here that falseness refers to the sequence of blows actually
struck rather than to the rows that were theoretically rung.  

If you take that perspective, then you would logically also check every
missed dodge or other crunch that reversed the order in which two adjacent
bells sounded.  

That seems an OTT way of thinking in a real world that is self policing.

-- 
John Harrison
Website http://jaharrison.me.uk