[r-t] Bobs only Stedman Triples

[Mark Davies]

Aha, thanks for the clarification Andrew.

So for the Stedman 5-, 6-, 10- and 20-part cases, although the extent 
can be decomposed into these parts, they cannot be linked; that 
presumably means that a 3-part is the highest-order exact multi-part 
possible for a bobs-only peal? Or is there a chance the 4-part search 
will yield results - from the paper it doesn't look like you exhausted 
this? (I'm not entirely clear how a 4-part peal could be linked, though).

Cheers
M