[r-t] Opinions sought

[Don Morrison]

Consider the following two callings of surprise minor. Two questions:

1) Are they spliced? That is are they both, neither, or just one of them,
and, if just one of them, which?

2) If you were somehow further constrained to call exactly one of them
spliced, which would you pick as the “more like spliced”?


Calling A:

1,440 (Spliced?) Surprise Minor (2 methods)
2345  W  H
__________
4235     -  IIIII.
3425     -  IIIII.
2345     -  IIIII.
5243  -     CCC.CC
3542  -     CCC.CC
4235  -  -  CCC.CC.
5432  -     CCC.CC
2534  -     CCC.CC
3425  -  -  CCC.CC.
5324  -     CCC.CC
4523  -     CCC.CC
2345  -  -  CCC.CC.
__________
Contains 1,080 Cambridge and 360 Ipswich, with 1 change of method
and all the work of both methods for every bell.



Calling B:

1,440 (Spliced?) Surprise Minor (2 methods)
2345  W  H
__________
4523  -  -  IIII.I.
3425  -     IIII.I
2534  -  -  IIII.I.
4235  -     IIII.I
3542  -  -  IIII.I.
2435  -  s  IIII.I.
3524  -  -  CCC.CC.
4325  -     CCC.CC
2543  -  -  CCC.CC.
3245  -     CCC.CC
4532  -  -  CCC.CC.
2345  -  s  CCC.CC.
__________
Contains 720 each Cambridge and Ipswich, with 1 change of method
and all the work of both methods for every bell.






-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
No one is the salt of the earth; and no one, at some moment in their
life, is not.     — Jorge Luis Borges, “Fragments from an Apocryphal
                                         Gospel,” tr Stephen Kessler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20190116/cd71736e/attachment.html>