[r-t] Opinions sought

[Robert Bennett]

Wasn't there a CCBR decision in the bad old days that for a peal to be
spliced, all the extents must be spliced?
I can't remember the wording, but maybe it didn't cover 1440s.

The above touches also have the atw feature.



On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:07 PM Alan Reading <alan.reading at googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Ofcourse the notion of "being spliced" also doesn't appear to be invariant
> under rotation.
> Simply rotate a 1440 comprised of 2 single method extents by anything
> other than 720 and it presumably goes from not being spliced to being
> spliced.
>
>
> On Wednesday, 16 January 2019, Mark Davies <mark at snowtiger.net> wrote:
>
>> Two changes of method.
>>
>> MBD
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ringing-theory mailing list
>> ringing-theory at bellringers.org
>> https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.org
> https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20190117/36600c15/attachment.html>